Alright, let's be brutally honest. Years of flailing around in the algorithmic trading sandbox have, against all odds, coughed up a few nuggets of something resembling success. Plural. Yes, you heard that right. Multiple strategies, in their own haphazard way, are hinting at potential. Don't get me wrong, I'm not popping champagne yet. In this game, "promising" can evaporate faster than a poorly backtested alpha.
My self-taught journey has been a masterclass in how not to build a software library. Driven by the glorious delusion that a working (and I use that term loosely) prototype is the only thing that matters, I've unleashed a torrent of code upon the digital world. Efficiency? Maintainability? Those were concerns for a future, more organized version of myself – a mythical creature that, frankly, I'm still waiting to meet.
The result? A sprawling digital wasteland. Tens of thousands of lines of code, scattered like digital dust bunnies across multiple libraries. Some of these code repositories have bravely faced the unknown without even the rudimentary protection of version control. It's a testament to the sheer force of will (or perhaps stubbornness) that anything functional emerged from this primordial soup of functions and classes.
Now, faced with the undeniable (and frankly, slightly terrifying) reality of actual working code amidst this chaos, a reckoning is in order. The noble quest: to forge a single, version-controlled library from the scattered remnants of past victories. It's like trying to assemble a decent piece of furniture from parts scavenged from a dozen different flat-pack nightmares, each with its own set of missing screws and incomprehensible instructions.
The question that lingers, the one that even my cynical mind can't entirely dismiss: should I have bothered with optimization earlier? Logically, yes. The sheer waste of time and effort inherent in rewriting the same basic functions repeatedly is staggering. But if I'm being truly honest, the answer is probably still no. The very act of stumbling through those inefficient early iterations was the only way I, a self-taught hack, could have pieced together the necessary understanding. I likely would have drowned in the intricacies of optimization before even grasping the fundamental concepts.
However, this chaotic pilgrimage through the land of spaghetti code hasn't been without its hard-won wisdom. Lessons have been learned, some etched in the digital scars of countless debugging sessions. Moving forward, a few key principles have been grudgingly adopted:
- The Power of Planning: Diving straight into code is exhilarating, but the long-term cost is… well, what you're currently reading about. Tools like Archimate and Obsidian, initially viewed with suspicion as "corporate fluff," have proven to be surprisingly effective allies in mapping out systems and organizing thoughts before a single line of code is written. Who knew that a little forethought could save weeks of untangling later?
- Embracing the Right Tools: Version control is no longer optional; it's the bedrock of any sane development process. Enough said.
- Cautious Optimisation with LLMs: The allure of Large Language Models for code optimization is strong. They can indeed be helpful in streamlining certain sections. However, the paranoia is real. For sensitive trading logic, the idea of sending code snippets to some cloud-based entity feels akin to broadcasting your strategies on a public billboard. The solution? Exploring offline LLM models. The potential gains are there, but the paranoia-driven caution remains paramount. Those things are practically digital spies.
So, here we are. The Sisyphean task of creating order from chaos has begun. A single library, bearing a consistent prefix across its various projects, will rise from the ashes of my coding misadventures. Some parts will be deemed worthy of public consumption, offered as a cautionary tale or perhaps even something genuinely useful. The truly valuable bits, the strategies that actually print numbers (for now, at least), will remain locked away in the "Black Box," their inner workings shielded from prying eyes and definitely not outsourced.
Don't expect a miraculous transformation into a paragon of coding virtue overnight. This is a salvage operation, a pragmatic attempt to build something sustainable from the wreckage of enthusiastic but ultimately disorganized experimentation. Consider this the next dispatch from the digital cleanup crew. The journey from algorithmic anarchy to something resembling order is likely to be long, filled with its own unique brand of cynical amusement, and hopefully, guided by a slightly more structured approach this time around. Stay tuned, if you dare.
No comments:
Post a Comment